Earned media and public campaigns have traditionally been left to patient support groups looking to raise money and awareness for specific, often rare, diseases. Explanations of treatment options have been left to doctors. But as those lines blur, is there an opportunity we shouldn’t miss?

Understandably, concerns around transparency and authenticity have kept pharma marketers out of this space. However, BMS’s “Ready. Raise. Rise” campaign has changed the game, by focusing on awareness of a treatment option rather than a specific type of cancer, they were able to engage with most of the general population. Through the use of earned and not owned media (i.e free not paid) their campaign gained traction and credibility, which was essential to educate people on immunotherapy.

So what are the benefits and challenges for earned media?


  • Credibility: Earned media is the most credible source of information and is most often trusted by audiences
  • Longevity: Earned media can have a long lasting life of its own 
  • Wide reach: Earned media can go viral and reach many audiences, whereas paid media is very targeted 


  • No control: To be genuinely earned, you cannot influence the coverage in anyway, meaning you have no control over what is published in the end (arguably the scariest part for most marketers)
  • More work: Earning media takes a lot more leg work and effort than simply paying for it. You have to understand the audiences, what they want to hear and craft your story so that they are interested

I would argue that the benefits far outweigh the challenges. With the healthcare industry rapidly evolving, I think this will become a critical step in drug and therapy development. If we reflect on the innovative treatment options in development, gene editing or cell therapy for example, one of the major concerns will be patient understanding and willingness. 

For the layman the idea of the gene editing is not only incredibly foreign, but can often be scary, “mad-scientist stuff." Thinking back to earlier in the year when CRISPR was making headlines, outside of the scientific community, most of the commentary was around designer babies. The conversation was negative and the potential CRISPR offered was glossed over. 

In a world where the media has often unrelenting influence, a lack of understanding can be a major hindrance to the innovation and advancement of these technologies. So could modelling the “Ready. Raise. Rise” campaign to educate the general population be an answer for these innovations? If you are willing to put in the effort, I think so.